Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news

The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.

refers to regulation that arrives from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case legislation, also known as “common regulation,” and “case precedent,” delivers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how These are applied in certain types of case.

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it proper to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified with the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

maintaining the conviction awarded into the appellant reduce the sentence of the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to try and do away with the candidature with the petitioner. Read more

Section 302 in the PPC deals with one of many most severe offenses in criminal legislation: murder. In this website read more post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, take a look at the punishment it involves, and examine some notable case laws related to this particular section.

S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation incorporates the names of the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it had been decided, as well as book in which it's recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.

Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, including eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.

2. I have listened to the learned counsel to the parties and discovered DPG at duration, perused the record and noticed that:-

Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses which include self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may result in reduced charges or acquittal.

This article delves into the intricacies on the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to supply a comprehensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.

104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly set up now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar towards the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay back and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them being fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)